Through the most basic of contemporary interaction between two parties of nominal intelligence, there is the presence of one recognizable apex, if not several. From one access point of deduction to the next (between parties) there's certain to be, at least, a minor degree of fluctuation or discretion regarding the placement or effect of said apex. On a basic level, it is for this reason that we find ourselves unable to establish a paradigm regarding the apex (or its related constituents).

Taking into consideration the paradox in defining the origin of the apex, it becomes far more bewildering when, after a period of time, the constituent events decay from memory, leaving the solitary apex intact.

Our senses of comprehension are yet to meet their evolutionary peak.